This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
No section 271B penalty if non-audit was due to Bonafide Belief that Accounts need not be Audited
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Anunoy Mukherjee Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2017-2018
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Kolkata
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Anunoy Mukherjee Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
Assessee is an individual and is engaged in the business of mobile recharging and earns income from commission from sale of such recharge coupons of Idea Cellular. Tax at source is deducted u/s 194C of the Act by the employer i.e., M/s. Ideal Cellular on the commission income on recharge coupons sold by the assessee. Income of Rs.4,21,640/- declared in the return filed for Assessment Year 2017-18 claiming TDS of 30,896/-. The case selected for limited scrutiny through CASS for the reason of cash deposit during the year. During the course ...
