Case Law Details
Case Name : Patodia Filaments Pvt Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All CESTAT CESTAT Ahmedabad
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Patodia Filaments Pvt Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
CESTAT find that notification No. 30/2004-CE dated 09.07.2004 is not an absolute notification but a conditional notification issued under section 5A. The notification has the condition of non availment of cenvat credit. The sub-rule (3) (i) and (ii) of Rule 11 of the CCR, 2004 are separate. In the present case the sub rule 3 (i) would thus apply as per which the manufacturer is required to pay an amount equivalent to the CENVAT Credit in respect of inputs used in the manufacture of said final product a...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

