This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Writ Jurisdiction of HC cannot be invoked on the ground that reasons recorded are not well-reasoned
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Lakshya Vintrade Private Limited Vs Union of India And Ors. (Calcutta High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2018-19
- Courts
- All High Courts, Calcutta High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Lakshya Vintrade Private Limited Vs Union of India And Ors. (Calcutta High Court)
The sole ground by the petitioner for challenging the impugned order under Section 148A(d) of the Act is that the same is not a speaking order and the reasons recorded therein are not well-reasoned and satisfactory which according to me cannot be a ground for interference with the same by invoking Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of Constitution of India.
FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
The Court: Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.
By this writ ...
