Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Corporate Law

Standard of proof for rebutting presumption is that of preponderance of probabilities in Negotiable Instruments Act

Case Law Details

Case Name
R. Tamilarasa Vs T.P. Rameshkumar (Madras High Court)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement R. Tamilarasa Vs T.P. Rameshkumar (Madras High Court) Standard of proof for rebutting the presumption is that of preponderance of probabilities in Negotiable Instruments Act Conclusion: The Hon’ble Madras High Court held that it is settled law that in the case under Section 138 of NI Act, Section 139 of NI Act provides that the Court shall presume that the holder of a cheque received the cheque of the nature referred into Section 138 of NI Act, for the discharge, in whole or in part or any debt or other liability. This presumption, however, is expressly made subject to the p...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *