Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ansal Properties & Industries Ltd. Vs Neelam Bhutani (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : W.P. (Civil) 4149/2015
Date of Judgement/Order : 15/06/2018
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Ansal Properties & Industries Ltd. Vs Neelam Bhutani (Delhi High Court)

APPLICABLE PROVISIONS

SECTION 33 IN THE INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES ACT, 1947

 Conditions of service, etc., to remain unchanged under certain circumstances during pendency of proceedings. –

(1) During the pendency of any conciliation proceeding before a conciliation officer or a Board or of any proceeding before an arbitrator or a Labour Court or Tribunal or National Tribunal in respect of an industrial dispute, no employer shall–

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

A Qualified Company Secretary, LLB , AIII , Bsc( Maths) BHU, Certification in Insurance Risk Management ( ICSI-III) have completed Limited Insolvency Examination and having more than 20 years of experience in the field of Secretarial Practice, Project Finance, Direct Taxes ,GST, Accounts & F View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Court is required to ensure that prima facie a genuine arbitrable dispute exists NCLT cannot declare IBC, 2016 provisions/Regulations as illegal/Ultra Virus Burden lies on insurance company to prove that licence of driver was fake Directors receiving remuneration is employee under ESI Act: SC Director of Company can file defamation case for Defamatory publication: SC View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031