This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Notice is mandatory for physical verification of place of business under Rule 25 of CGST Rules, 2017
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Bimal Kothari Vs Assistant Commissioner (DSGST) & Ors (Delhi High court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Delhi High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Bimal Kothari Vs Assistant Commissioner (DSGST) & Ors (Delhi High court)
The Hon’ble Delhi High Court (“the High Court”) in the case of M/s. Bimal Kothatri v. Assistant Commissioner (DSGST) & Ors. [(W.P.(C) 9207/2019 & CM No. 37947/2019] dated November 01, 2022, held that cancellation of GST registration is not sustainable when no notice was serviced upon the registered person for conducting physical verification of business premise under Rule 25 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 (“the CGST Rules”) which was not given, clearly violating the provision of th...
Author Info
