This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Interest on loan cannot be treated as unexplained
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Sathyanarayanan Radhika Vs ACIT (ITAT Chennai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2016-17
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Chennai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Sathyanarayanan Radhika Vs ACIT (ITAT Chennai)
ITAT noted that the loan amount of Rs. 1.25 Crores was taken in previous year from Shri R. Sathyanarayanan and the balance amount of Rs. 17,00,690/- was interest on the loan amount and this cannot be treated as unexplained and moreover, there is no failure of the provisions of s. 269SS of the Act, because the assessee has not received any cash loan. Hence, we quash the revision order and allow the appeal of the assessee.
FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF ITAT CHENNAI
This appeal by the assessee is arising out of the revision order of Principal Commissione...
