Case Law Details
Imax Infrastructure Private Limited Vs Deputy Commissioner (Calcutta High Court)
Mr. Ghosh also raised point of maintainability of the writ petition on the ground of availability of alternative remedy by way of an appellate forum but the same is not sustainable for the reason that it is a well settled principle that alternative remedy is not always a bar and particularly when the question of jurisdiction is involved in the writ petition and the writ court is very much empowered to entertain the writ petition, if an order or action of an officer is without jurisdiction or there is a violation of principle of natural justice or constitutional validity of a provision of law is involved and prima facie the petitioner has been able to make out a case that the issue involved in this case is the jurisdiction of the officer concerned who has exercised the power of a GST Officer and since interpretation of several provisions of law and notifications are involved, this writ petition cannot be thrown out at the motion stage on the ground of availability of alternative remedy and this writ petition has to be heard and decided on merit.
FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Heard learned advocates appearing for the parties.
In this writ petition, petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 3rd March, 2022 passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Revenue, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence and Enforcement, under Section 74(9) of the State GST Act, on the ground that the same is without jurisdiction by contending that the initiation of proceeding in question under the State GST Act is without jurisdiction and he cannot act as an officer under the State GST Act.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
