Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mihir Madhavrao Suryawanshi Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Mihir Madhavrao Suryawanshi Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) Impugned Section 271(c) penalty has arisen in consequence to the lower authorities action disallowing the assessee’s section 54F deduction claim. And in assessee’s quantum appeal ITAT has already deleted the foregoing 54F disallowance and therefore, penalty in issue herein has no legs to stands as a necessary corollary. FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF ITAT PUNE This assessee’s appeal for AY 2013-14 arises against the CIT(A)-1, Pune’s order dated 27-11-2019 passed in case No. PN/CIT(A)-1/ITO, WD11(2)/PN/47/2017-18 involving procee...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930