Transponder Charges cannot be treated as ‘Royalty Income’ despite amendment to section 9(1)(vi)
Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Transponder Charges cannot be treated as ‘Royalty Income’ despite amendment to section 9(1)(vi)

Case Law Details

Case Name
ACIT Vs Viacom18 Media Private Limited (ITAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2015-16
Advertisement
ACIT Vs Viacom18 Media Private Limited (ITAT Mumbai) Ld.CIT(A) referred to master agreement between the assessee and Intersat Corporation, USA to highlight the services of transponding facility provided by the party. The Ld.CIT(A) has noted that while passing the order dated 28/03/2014, 04/02/2015 and 10/02/2015 in assessee’s own case, the Tribunal was not having any benefit of the decision of the Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the case of New Sports Broadcast Pvt Ltd (ITA 1487 of 2018) and, therefore, transponder payments were held to be royalty, taxable under the Act / Treaty. However, sub...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *