This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Transponder Charges cannot be treated as ‘Royalty Income’ despite amendment to section 9(1)(vi)
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- ACIT Vs Viacom18 Media Private Limited (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2015-16
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
ACIT Vs Viacom18 Media Private Limited (ITAT Mumbai)
Ld.CIT(A) referred to master agreement between the assessee and Intersat Corporation, USA to highlight the services of transponding facility provided by the party. The Ld.CIT(A) has noted that while passing the order dated 28/03/2014, 04/02/2015 and 10/02/2015 in assessee’s own case, the Tribunal was not having any benefit of the decision of the Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the case of New Sports Broadcast Pvt Ltd (ITA 1487 of 2018) and, therefore, transponder payments were held to be royalty, taxable under the Act / Treaty. However, sub...




