Hindu personal law requires presence of a male for constitution of HUF: SC

By Editor4 Income Tax Judiciary February 22, 2001

Case Name: CIT Vs. Smt. Sandhya Rani Dutta (Supreme Court)
Appeal Number: Only available for paid members
Date of Judgement/Order: Only available for paid members
Courts: Supreme Court of India

Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.

Already Upgraded? Log in.

Advertisement CIT Vs. Smt. Sandhya Rani Dutta (Supreme Court) Explore the Supreme Court judgment in the case of CIT Vs. Smt. Sandhya Rani Dutta, addressing pivotal questions on Hindu personal law. The ruling asserts that, according to the Dayabhaga School, a male presence is essential for the constitution of a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF). Delve into the detailed analysis of the case, where the court examines whether female heirs can form a joint Hindu family by agreement and impress upon inherited property the character of joint family property. Gain insights into the court’s interpr...

This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.