Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Signed document cannot be whimsically discarded; Don’t burden Taxpayer with unfair additions

Case Law Details

Case Name
Naresh Sharma Vs AO (ITAT Chandigarh)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2010-11
Advertisement
Naresh Sharma Vs AO (ITAT Chandigarh) 1. The AO needs to ascertain if the sale transaction was indeed genuine and whether the signatures on the Agreement to Sell ‘Ikrarnama’ has been disowned by the purchaser as a forgery. 2. When a document duly relied upon by one of the parties is allegedly signed by both parties, the fact that it is the only document which has been made available as an evidence cannot be whimsically discarded. 3. Best Evidence Rule – the admission of oral evidence be excluded for proving the contents of the document duly signed and excluded by the two parties ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *