This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Signed document cannot be whimsically discarded; Don’t burden Taxpayer with unfair additions
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Naresh Sharma Vs AO (ITAT Chandigarh)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2010-11
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Chandigarh
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Naresh Sharma Vs AO (ITAT Chandigarh)
1. The AO needs to ascertain if the sale transaction was indeed genuine and whether the signatures on the Agreement to Sell ‘Ikrarnama’ has been disowned by the purchaser as a forgery.
2. When a document duly relied upon by one of the parties is allegedly signed by both parties, the fact that it is the only document which has been made available as an evidence cannot be whimsically discarded.
3. Best Evidence Rule – the admission of oral evidence be excluded for proving the contents of the document duly signed and excluded by the two parties ...





