Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Corporate Law

Application u/s 9 of IBC, 2016 is maintainable irrespective of amount of claim

Case Law Details

Case Name
Aster Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Vs Solas Fire Safety Equipment Pvt. Ltd (NCLAT)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Courts
NCLAT
Advertisement
Aster Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Vs Solas Fire Safety Equipment Pvt. Ltd (NCLAT) Brief Facts: An application was filed under Section 9 of IBC and the Adjudicating Authority issued Notice but none appeared for Respondent. The Adjudicating Authority disposed of by directing the Respondent to settle the issue in question within a stipulated period while observing that: “the Respondent did not appear before the Adjudicating Authority, the amount involved in the case is mere Rs. 4.35 lakhs and initiation of CIRP is not a solution for the Petitioner, which is a small entrepreneur and operational Cre...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *