Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Peps Industries Private Limited Vs. Kurlon Limited (Delhi High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Peps Industries Private Limited Vs. Kurlon Limited  (Delhi High Court)  FACTS In the present case, Peps Industries Pvt. Ltd. (‘Plaintiff’) is the owner of registered trademark “NO TURN”. The Plaintiff had registered the same under Class 20 for mattresses, wall beds, adjustable beds, sofas, pillows, cushions and other related products in the year 2008. The mark was granted registration in February 2011 with effect from January 2008. Since 15.01.2008, the Plaintiff had been continuously, consistently and uninterruptedly using its trademark NO TURN in relation to its products be...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

As a Counsel, his focus areas of practice are Arbitration, GST/indirect tax, Customs, International Laws, Regulatory, Data Privacy, Employment Laws & White collar crimes. As a strategic advisor, he has a rich experience in M&A, Joint ventures, Due Diligence and Cross border transactions. View Full Profile

My Published Posts

GST SCN worded as Final Order Without Proper Hearing Unsustainable: Gujarat HC Guj HC grants Stays against GST-DRC-13 considering balance of convenience Section 17(5)(c) & (d) of CGST Act, 2017- Post-Safari Retreats Judgment SEZ Unit Entitled To Claim Refund of Unutilized ITC Seizure Memo of DRI devoid of reasons liable to be Quashed & Set Aside View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930