This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Prior period expenditure was allowed to be set off against prior period income
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Pr. CIT Vs Dishman Pharmaceuticals And Chemicals Ltd (Gujarat High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2006-07
- Courts
- All High Courts, Gujarat High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
PCIT Vs Dishman Pharmaceuticals And Chemicals Ltd (Gujarat High Court)
Conclusion: Once the prior period income was held to be taxable, the prior period expenditure also should be allowed to be set off and assessee was not obliged in law to indicate any direct or indirect nexus between the prior period income and prior period expenditure.
Held: AO found that assessee credited net period income i.e. prior period income minus prior period expenses. AO took the view that during the year under consideration the “prior period income” was taxable, but the “prior period expenses” were not al...






This judgement is incorrect.. Sec.37 allows expenditure of current period only and not earlier prior period..