Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Provisions of Section 245D (2C) can be invoked only if the assessee does not deposit income tax payable on income disclosed

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2015 taxguru.in 248
Case Name
CIT Vs Vishan Das (Delhi High Court)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement

Issue before court:

  • Whether assessee has defaulted in payment in payment of additional amount of income-tax payable on the income disclosed in the original application and provision of section 245D (2C) can be invoked in such circumstances.

Brief facts:

  • A search u/s 132 was conducted in the premises of K.C. Group of cases on 5.10.2001. During the search beside cash of Rs. 2,16,500/- and stock worth Rs. 53,21 ,218/- ,a number of incriminating documents and books of accounts were seized.
  • Notice u/s 158BC of the Act was served upon these assessees on 8.10.2002. In response, assessee filed return for the block period ending 5.10.2001 on 10.12.2002 declaring nil undisclosed income.
  • Immediately thereafter on 11.12.2002, applications u/s 245C(1) of the Act were filed before the Settlement Commission, disclosing income of Rs. 10,00,000/- in the hands of each of the four assessees i.e an amount of Rs. 40,00,000/- @2% of the turnover of Rs. 20 crores.
  • The applications were admitted u/s 245D(1) of the Act vide the order dated 23.10.2003.
  • Subsequently , these assesses deposited tax of Rs. 6,12,000/- each on 26.12.2003 in terms of aforesaid order dated 23.10.20030.
  • Later, assesse deposited Rs. 12,240/- on 24.07.2007. After admission of the application u/s 245D(1) of the Act, the Commission called for a report under Rule 9 of the Settlement Commission Rules, from the concerned CIT. In the light of said report, the Settlement Commission passed and an order u/s 245D(4) of the Act on 26.03.2010.
  • The final order directed the revenue to accept the offer of additional income of Rs. 1,48,16,160/- referred to in the body of settlement commission’s order.
  • Consequently, interest under Section 220(2) in terms of Section 245D(2C) was directed to be recovered. While computing the amounts payable, the AO passed in his consequential order dated 4.5.2010, Rs. 13,03,211/- as interest recoverable for the period between 1.1.2004 and 26.3.2010.

Contention of the revenue:

Paid content

Become a Basic or Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Basic or Premium member.

Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.