This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Consultancy services and Independent personal services in the context of a DTAA explained
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- CIT Vs Grup ISM P. Ltd. (Delhi High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Delhi High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Brief Facts of the Case and Question of law
Brief Facts: the assessee Company made payment of Rs. 56,54,963/- to M/s. CGS International, UAE (“CGS International”) and Rs. 37,76,863/- to M/s. Marble Arts & Crafts LLC, UAE (Marble Arts & Crafts) (aggregating to Rs. 94,31,826/-). The AO noted that no TDS had been deducted by the assessee while making the payment to the said two foreign concerns. AO required the assessee to show cause why the said expenditure should not be disallowed under Section 40(a)(i) of the Act.
The assessee did not deduct TDS on the sum of Rs. 9...






Very useful article. Thnk. U very much.