Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Pr. Commissioner of Income­Tax­ Vs M/s. Reliance Capital Asset Management Ltd. (Bombay High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
The Assessing Officer did not specifically record that he is not satisfied with the correctness of the claim of the assessee in respect of the expenditure in relation to the income which does not form part of the total income under the Act. However, he felt obliged and going by the presence of Rule 8D that once Section 14A is attracted, the disallowance is to be made as per Rule 8D only which has been prescribed by the Legislature. The Assessing Officer has not adverted to the plain language of sub­section (2) of Section 14A. The fact that the CIT(A) and ITAT were not satisfied with the asses...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930