This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Recovery cannot be effected 3 years from the date of SCN
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Sagar Drugs and Pharmaceuticals P. Ltd. Vs C.C.E. (CESTAT Ahemdabad)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Ahmedabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Next question needs to be considered is whether the demand for the period March 2003 to February 2007 can be enforced when the demand notice was issued on 14.9.2007. In the aforesaid case where the Honorable High Court observed that the in absence of time limit prescribed for recovery, a reasonable period, be applied for recovery of the amount. More or less in similar circumstances, where the Honorable Gujarat High Court while directing recovery of the amount in Pratibha Syntex Ltd. Vs. UOI 2013 (287) ELT 290 (Guj.) observed that judging the period of limitation from the armchair of a reasonab...
