This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 254(2) cannot be applied to seek review of ITAT order
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Ganjikunta Kishore Babu (HUF) Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Hyderabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
By Section 254(4) of the IT Act, an order which has been passed by the Tribunal reaches finality the moment the same is passed: it cannot be touched thereafter. By section 254(2) of the act, the Tribunal, however, has been authorized to rectify mistakes in its orders, which are apparent on the face of the records. The expression “mistake apparent on the record” means a mistake either clerical or grammatical or arithmetical or of like nature, which can be detected without there being any necessity to re-argue the matter or to reappraise the facts as appearing from the records.
1. The asses...




