This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Splitting of cash payment to circumvent law attracts Section 40A(3)
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Vaishali Builders & Colonizers Vs Additional Commissioner of Income-tax, (ITAT Jodhpur)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2008-09
- Courts
- ITAT Jodhpur
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
IN THE ITAT JODHPUR BENCH
Vaishali Builders & Colonizers
versus
Additional Commissioner of Income-tax,
IT APPEAL NO. 391 (JODH.) OF 2011
[ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-09]
JULY 25, 2012
ORDER
Bhavnesh Saini, Judicial Member
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of the ld. CIT(A), Jodhpur dated 13.10.2011 for the assessment year 2008-09 on the following grounds :
“1. The impugned order passed by the Ld. CIT(A) and the impugned assessment order is contrary to the provisions of law, contrary to facts, material and evidence existing on records, contrary to all...






Very nice case.
Is it applicable for Raw Material purchase for goods manufacture?. Some time we can get cash discount also for cash payment made or we can bargaing the less rate. In this situation, whether this case will apply?.
good one..
I used this case law for convincing my management for similar other exp to route through bank.