Case Law Details
Case Name : Commissioner Of Income Tax Vs Godavaridevi Saraf (Bombay High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All High Courts Bombay High Court
In an old judgement but useful Judgment Bombay High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Godavari Saraf held that until contrary decision is given by any other competent High Court, which is binding on a Tribunal in the relevant State, it has to proceed on the footing that the law declared by the High Court, though of another State, is the final law of the land. Which means that once a decision is given by any of the High Courts in the country and there is no contrary decision by any other High Court on the same issue then such decision of High Court will be binding on all the administrative auth...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
Author Bio
However, in CIT v. Thana Electric Supply Ltd {(1994) 206 ITR 727 Bom HC}- followed in Consolidated Pneumatic Tool Co.(I) Ltd v. CIT {(1995) 79 Taxman 458 Bom HC-DB}, it has been held that that decision of High Court is not binding precedent on Courts or tribunals outside the jurisdiction of that High Court. It has only persuasive effect on Courts and tribunals outside the jurisdiction of that High Court.
There seems to be no judgment of Supreme Court on this issue. However, in my considered view usually (by virtue of Article 227 of the Constitution), decision of High Court is considered as binding only on Courts and tribunals situated within the territorial jurisdiction of that High Court.
Regards
Narendra Sharma,
Consultant (Business Laws)
I have completed my job in a pvt. sector for 4 years and 10 months and recently resigned from the service and my question is that whether i am eligible for gratuity or not and if yes than you please give me the gratuity notification and any supreme court judgement copy.