Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

S. 274 notice must specify if its for concealment or for incorrect particulars

Case Law Details

Case Name
Sanghavi Savla Commodity Brokers P. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2007-08
Advertisement
Facts of the Case The assessee, a company engaged in the business of trading and brokerage in commodity futures market with MCX, filed its return of income for A.Y. 2007-08 on 29.10.2007 declaring income of `,14,32,310/-. The case was taken up for scrutiny and the assessment was completed under section 143(3) of the Act vide order dated 30.12.2009 wherein the income of the assessee was determined at `59,32,310/-, in view of an addition of `45,00,000/- to the returned income in view of a disclosure made by the assessee vide letter dated 28.04.2008. While completing the assessment, the Assessing...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *