Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

ITAT Hyderabad Allows Section 54F Deduction for 13 Residential Units

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2026 taxguru.in 13031
Case Name
Mekala Sharath Reddy (HUF) Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad)
Appeal Number
Premium Access
Date of Judgement/Order
Premium Access
Related Assessment Year
2009-10
Subscribe to download.

Already Upgraded? Log in.

Advertisement

Mekala Sharath Reddy (HUF) Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad)

Summary: The appeal concerns the allowability of deduction under Section 54F of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for investment in construction of multiple residential units for Assessment Year 2009-10. The assessee had filed the return on 27.07.2009 declaring total income of Rs.50,69,730/-. During the relevant year, an immovable property was sold for Rs.1,50,00,000/-. After claiming indexed cost of acquisition of Rs.1,73,704/-, long-term capital gain was computed at Rs.1,48,26,296/-. After claiming deduction under Section 54, the assessee offered net capital gain of Rs.50,26,296/- to tax.

This was the second round of appeal before the Tribunal. In the first round, the Assessing Officer had brought the entire receipt of Rs.1,50,00,000/- to tax. The Tribunal, by order dated 31.01.2020 in ITA No.860/Hyd/2013, restored the issue to the Assessing Officer with directions to examine the assessee’s claim under Section 54F as per law. During the set-aside proceedings, notices were issued but were not complied with. The Assessing Officer thereafter completed assessment under sections 143(3), 254 and 144B vide order dated 14.09.2021, assessing income at Rs.1,50,43,430/-. The CIT(A), after obtaining a remand report, dismissed the appeal and upheld the Assessing Officer’s action.

Before the Tribunal, the assessee challenged rejection of deduction of Rs.99,73,700/- under section 54F. Three principal objections had been raised by the CIT(A): investment in multiple residential units rather than one residential house; construction allegedly deviating from the approved plan; and failure to furnish complete bank statements evidencing utilisation of funds.

Want to Read the Complete Judgment?

You have read the free case summary. Unlock the full judgment, the detailed judicial reasoning and the downloadable PDF, along with every other premium judgment on TaxGuru.

Read on with Premium
Goes straight to payment. GST invoice included.

One subscription covers the entire premium judgment library, not just this case.

Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.