This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Dealership Termination Alone Does Not Establish Competition Law Violation: CCI
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Rajeev Bakshi Vs Nissan Motor India Pvt. Ltd. (Competition Commission of India)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Rajeev Bakshi Vs Nissan Motor India Pvt. Ltd. (Competition Commission of India)
The Competition Commission of India (CCI) considered information filed under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 alleging contravention of Sections 3 and 4 by an automobile manufacturer. The informant, an authorised dealer, contended that its dealership agreement was terminated before expiry of its term without a show cause notice, reasons or opportunity of hearing. It was further alleged that the manufacturer adopted coercive pricing policies, forced investments, delayed reimbursements, ...
Author Info
