Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Section 40A(3) Addition Quashed as Department Failed to Prove Single-Day Violation

Case Law Details

Case Name
Maya Devi Suhalka Vs ITO (ITAT Jodhpur)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2020-21
Advertisement
Maya Devi Suhalka Vs ITO (ITAT Jodhpur) The appeal before the ITAT Jodhpur arose from the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre dated 30.10.2025 for AY 2020-21, wherein the addition of ₹2,40,000 under Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act was confirmed on account of alleged cash payment of rent. The assessee, an individual engaged in the retail sale of IMFL and beer, had obtained a liquor licence from the Rajasthan State Excise Department for FY 2019-20. The rented premises used for the business were taken on monthly rent of ₹10,000. The assessee furnished the rent ledger showing tha...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 17,768

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *