This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Final Additions Differed from Recorded Reasons
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Kavita Pahuja Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2014-15
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Kavita Pahuja Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) allowed both appeals filed by the assessee, comprising a quantum appeal and a penalty appeal arising from proceedings under Sections 147 and 144B of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
The Tribunal first considered the quantum appeal and examined the assessee’s legal challenge to the validity of the reassessment proceedings. The assessee contended that the reopening of assessment was unsustainable because the reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer differed from the additions ultimately made in the asse...





