This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Use of Word ‘Shall’ Does Not Automatically Make GST Timeline Mandatory: Allahabad HC
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Shiva Enterprises Vs State of U.P. And Another (Allahabad High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Allahabad High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Shiva Enterprises Vs State of U.P. And Another (Allahabad High Court)
Section 129 GST Timelines Held Directory as Law Prescribes No Consequence for Delay; GST Penalty Proceedings Not Invalid Merely Because Order Was Passed on Eighth Day; Allahabad HC Disagrees With Gujarat, Patna and Orissa High Courts on Mandatory GST Timelines; GST Detention Proceedings Upheld Because Delay Did Not Defeat Purpose of Statute: Allahabad HC
In , the writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenged detention proceedings, notice, and penalty order issued under Section 129 of the CGST/UPGS...



