Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Search Surrender Doesn’t Mean Maximum Penalty: ITAT Cuts Section 271AAB Levy from 90% to 30%

Case Law Details

Case Name
Jasraj Changalal Jain Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2013-14
Advertisement Jasraj Changalal Jain Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Search Surrender Doesn’t Mean Maximum Penalty: ITAT Cuts Section 271AAB Levy from 90% to 30% The Mumbai ITAT granted substantial relief to an assessee by reducing penalty under Section 271AAB from a harsh 90% to 30%, holding that the AO cannot mechanically impose the maximum penalty without recording extraordinary reasons. During a search under Section 132, cash of over ₹33 lakh was found from the assessee’s premises. In his statement recorded under Section 132(4), the assessee admitted that the cash belonged to him and accepte...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 5,842

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *