This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
ITAT Restricts Bogus Purchase Addition Due to Lack of Independent Enquiry by AO
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- DCIT Vs Sudesna Arunkumar Dana (ITAT Pune)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2011-12
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
DCIT Vs Sudesna Arunkumar Dana (ITAT Pune)
Entire Purchase Cannot Be Treated as Bogus When Sales Are Accepted; ITAT Upholds Partial Disallowance as Assessee Already Offered Income Under Section 41(1); Bogus Purchase Addition Reduced Because AO Failed to Identify Alleged Bill Providers; ITAT Dismisses Revenue Appeal Against Relief Granted in Bogus Purchase Case.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Pune Bench, dismissed both the Revenue’s appeal and the assessee’s cross objection for Assessment Year 2011-12 in a case concerning alleged bogus purchases. The Revenue chal...




