Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Sudesna Arunkumar Dana (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Sudesna Arunkumar Dana (ITAT Pune) Entire Purchase Cannot Be Treated as Bogus When Sales Are Accepted; ITAT Upholds Partial Disallowance as Assessee Already Offered Income Under Section 41(1); Bogus Purchase Addition Reduced Because AO Failed to Identify Alleged Bill Providers; ITAT Dismisses Revenue Appeal Against Relief Granted in Bogus Purchase Case. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Pune Bench, dismissed both the Revenue’s appeal and the assessee’s cross objection for Assessment Year 2011-12 in a case concerning alleged bogus purchases. The Revenue challenged the order ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930