Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Susan Thomas Vs ITO (Karnataka High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Susan Thomas Vs ITO (Karnataka High Court) The Karnataka High Court set aside a rectification order passed under Section 154 for AY 2011–12, holding that the assessee’s claim of exemption under Section 54-based on deposit in the Capital Gains Account-required proper consideration. Since supporting material was produced, the Court found it appropriate to remand the matter to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication. Importantly, the issue of whether Section 154 proceedings were validly invoked was kept open for reconsideration. The assessee was directed to appear before the AO without a...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930