Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Skyline Greathills Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Skyline Greathills Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) CIT(A) Cannot Enhance on New Issue; JDA Additions & U/s 2(22)(e) Deletions Upheld In this cross-appeal, the ITAT dealt with three major issues—(i) enhancement by CIT(A), (ii) deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e), and (iii) addition on JDA valuation. 1. Enhancement by CIT(A)- Held Invalid The CIT(A) reduced WIP by ~₹11.97 crore on the ground that income disclosed during survey was neutralized by capitalization. However, the ITAT held that CIT(A) cannot enhance income by introducing a new issue/source not examined by the AO, as per settled law (Shapoorji ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence Section 54F Exemption Allowed on Sale of Redeveloped Flat: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031