Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mohammed Yousuf Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Mohammed Yousuf Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) In , the ITAT Bangalore quashed the entire reassessment proceedings, holding that the foundation itself was legally defective due to violation of Sec 148A(b) and breach of limitation u/s 149. The Tribunal noted that the notice issued u/s 148A(b) granted only 5 days for response, whereas the statute mandates a minimum 7 days, making the notice invalid and contrary to law. This procedural lapse was held to be fatal, as it strikes at the root of jurisdiction. Further, the notice u/s 148 was issued on 04.04.2022 for AY 2015-16, whereas the limitation expir...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

No Specific Charge, No Penalty: Mumbai ITAT Cancels Section 270A Levy for Defective Notice Mere Investigation Wing Alert Is Not ‘Reason to Believe’: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Reopening Liquor Trader Gets Relief as ITAT Reduces GP Rate to 3.13% & Deletes Separate Expense Disallowance From Clean Chit to Crores in Penalty: SEBI Reopens Suzlon Case and Strikes Hard ITAT Restores Section 69 Matter to AO After Ex Parte Assessment and Appeal Orders View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930