This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 68 Addition Deleted as AO Relied Only on Suspicion & Third-Party Material
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Piyush Ashok Mehta Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2009-2010
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Piyush Ashok Mehta Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Sec 68 Addition Deleted – Assessee Discharged Onus; AO Relied Only on Suspicion & Third-Party Material
Assessee faced addition of ₹20 lakh (AY 2009-10) & ₹8 lakh (AY 2010-11) u/s 68 towards unsecured loans from Cartier Gems, based on survey findings in group cases alleging accommodation entries. CIT(A) upheld additions.
Before ITAT, assessee demonstrated that complete evidences were furnished including loan confirmations, PAN, bank statements, financials & reply u/s 133(6) from lender. It was contended that AO made...
Author Info
