This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Demonetization Cash Deposits: 69A Addition Invalid on Mere Suspicion – ITAT Bangalore
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Pramod Basavaraj Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2017-18
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Bangalore
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Pramod Basavaraj Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Demonetization Cash Deposits – Addition U/s 69A Cannot Be Made Merely on Suspicion Without Proper Enquiry: ITAT Bangalore
The ITAT Bangalore held that addition under Section 69A in respect of demonetization cash deposits cannot be sustained when the AO rejects the assessee’s explanation without conducting proper enquiry or verification.
In the present case, the assessee deposited ₹28 lakh in cash during the demonetization period. The assessee explained that the deposits represented return of advances earlier given for purchase of property and ...
Author Info
