Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Excise Duty

Soil Conditioner Classification Dispute Remanded Because NPK Threshold Not Examined: CESTAT Ahmedabad

Case Law Details

Case Name
Sikko Industries Limited Vs CCE (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement
Sikko Industries Limited Vs CCE (CESTAT Ahmedabad) The appeal before the Tribunal concerned the classification of a product named “Sikko Fast,” manufactured by the appellant, a company engaged in producing NPK fertilisers, organic fertilisers, seaweed-based fertilisers, and soil conditioners. The appellant had been clearing its products as fertilisers under Chapter 31 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Following a search conducted at the appellant’s factory premises, revenue officials found that the appellant had begun manufacturing a new soil conditioner marketed under the brand na...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *