This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
ITAT Ahmedabad Deletes Sec 69 Additions; NRI Property, Cash & Stamp Duty Explained with Bank Evidence After DRP Relief
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Sureshkumar Kasturram Purohit Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2016-17
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Ahmedabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Sureshkumar Kasturram Purohit Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
NRI Property Investment – Additions U/s 69 Deleted After DRP Relief – Cash Deposit & Stamp Duty Explained with Bank Evidence – ITAT Ahmedabad
The assessee, a US-based NRI, faced reassessment relating to investment in a residential flat, where additions were proposed u/s 69 for unexplained investment. While DRP granted substantial relief by accepting documentary evidence for most payments, it sustained addition of ₹5.32 lakh relating to cash deposit, stamp duty and registration charges.
Before ITAT, the assessee produ...


