Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ishwarlal Javahara Ram Purohit Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ishwarlal Javahara Ram Purohit Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Cash Component Addition U/s 153C Deleted – Pen Drive & Third-Party Statements Without Cross-Examination Held Insufficient – ITAT Mumbai Addition of ₹2 lakh alleged cash component paid for purchase of shop in Platinum Mall was made u/s 153C based on search in Rubberwala Group where pen drive, excel sheets & third-party statements suggested receipt of on-money. Tribunal observed that no incriminating material directly linking assessee (such as cash vouchers, receipts or signed documents) was found during search and AO rel...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930