Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Pradip Kumar Roy Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Pradip Kumar Roy Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) The Bangalore ‘C’ Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Bench allowed the appeal of Shri Rahul Meka for AY 2016-17 and quashed the reassessment proceedings, holding that the sanction obtained for reopening was from an incorrect authority, thereby rendering the notice u/s 148 and consequent assessment void ab initio. The assessee, a non-resident, had originally declared income of ₹15,850, but the AO reopened the case and made additions including ₹47 lakh u/s 68 and ₹28.53 lakh LTCG with denial of exemption u/s 54F. The Tribunal ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930