Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Tarachand Gupta Foundation Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2023-24
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Tarachand Gupta Foundation Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) The ITAT, Pune Bench held that selection of case for compulsory scrutiny was valid, since at the time of selection the assessee’s regular registration u/s 12A stood rejected by the CIT(E). The CBDT parameters expressly permit compulsory scrutiny where exemption is claimed without subsisting registration; hence, the AO rightly assumed jurisdiction. However, on merits, the Tribunal noted that the rejection of 12A registration had already been set aside by the ITAT in separate proceedings and the matter was remanded to CIT(E) for fresh adjudication....
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930