This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
General Power of Attorney cannot be treated as JDA for taxing capital gains
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Smt. Neha Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2016-17
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Hyderabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Smt. Neha Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
The appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Hyderabad concerned reassessment proceedings for Assessment Year 2016–17 and an addition sustained on the basis of an alleged Joint Development Agreement (JDA). The assessee had filed her return declaring income of ₹3,05,700. The case was reopened under section 147 on the premise that capital gains arising from a JDA valued at ₹1,76,00,000 had not been offered to tax. The Assessing Officer completed reassessment under sections 147 read with 144B and made an addition of ₹1,76,00,000 under section ...




