Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ruby Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Agra)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ruby Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Agra) ITAT Agra Deletes Section 68 Addition on Share Sale Proceeds; Bank Statement Not ‘Books of Account’ The Agra Bench of the ITAT allowed the assessee’s appeal and deleted the addition of ₹16,88,061 made under section 68 on account of sale proceeds of listed shares, along with the consequential addition of ₹50,645 under section 69C towards alleged commission for accommodation entries. The assessee, an individual not maintaining books of account and having no business income, had claimed exemption under section 10(38) on long-term capital gains arising from s...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930