Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Niraj Pravinchandra Doshi Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2009-10
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Niraj Pravinchandra Doshi Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Bogus Purchases: ITAT Mumbai Restricts Addition to 5% Where Sales Are Undisputed The Mumbai ITAT (SMC Bench) partly allowed the appeal of the assessee for AY 2009-10 concerning estimated additions on account of alleged bogus purchases. The Assessing Officer had treated purchases from six parties as non-genuine based on information from the Investigation Wing/Sales Tax Department and made an addition at 12.5% of such purchases, amounting to ₹39.17 lakh. The CIT(A) upheld the addition in a brief order. Before the Tribunal, the assessee did not pre...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Wrong Section Used to Deny Depreciation Set-Off; Section 263 Order Quashed Municipal Body’s Section 10(20) Exemption Cannot Be Denied Due to Wrong Claim in Return No Addition on a Different Issue if Reopened Issue Fails: ITAT Deletes ₹5.75 Crore Disallowance Retracted Statement Alone Cannot Justify Section 68 Addition: ITAT Deletes Accommodation Loan Additions Section 263 Cannot Be Invoked as AO Made No Addition After Enquiry: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930