Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sukesini Kumili Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sukesini Kumili Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) Reassessment & Penalty Quashed: Notices Issued by Jurisdictional AO After Faceless Scheme Held Void The Hyderabad Bench (SMC) of the ITAT quashed reassessment proceedings as well as consequential penalty orders for AYs 2015-16 and 2016-17, holding that notices issued under Section 148 and orders passed under Section 148A(d) by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) after 29.03.2022 were without jurisdiction and void ab initio. The Tribunal noted that, pursuant to CBDT Notification No. 18/2022 dated 29.03.2022 issued under Section 151A, all reasse...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930