This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Jurisdictional Defect: No Section 143(2) Notice After Reopening
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Rupinder Kaur Arora Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2012-13
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Rupinder Kaur Arora Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Reassessment Quashed for Non-Issuance of 143(2) – Jurisdictional Defect Cannot Be Cured by Participation
The Delhi ITAT allowed the assessee’s appeal and quashed the reassessment for AY 2012-13 on the ground that no notice under Section 143(2) was ever issued, rendering the entire assessment without jurisdiction. The Tribunal found that neither the assessment order nor the NFAC order recorded any clear details regarding issuance of notice under Section 143(2), and the screenshots of the ITBA portal produced by the assessee showed issuance of notice ...





