Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Jagmag Mercantiles Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Jagmag Mercantiles Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata) Unsigned Section 148 Notice and No Failure to Disclose Facts: ITAT Kolkata Quashes Reopenings for Two Years The Kolkata Bench of the ITAT allowed the assessee’s appeals for AYs 2013-14 and 2014-15 and quashed the reassessment proceedings on multiple jurisdictional grounds. First, the Tribunal found that the notice issued under section 148 was unsigned, neither digitally nor manually. Relying on binding precedents of the Bombay High Court (Prakash Krishnavtar Bhardwaj), Karnataka High Court (Panjos Builders), and the jurisdictional Calc...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Quashes U/s 153C Assessments: AO Cannot Simply Copy Satisfaction Note Reopening Quashed: AO Added Share Capital, Loan & Premium Without Understanding Transaction Nature WhatsApp Chats, Screenshots & Suspicion Can’t Prove On-Money: ITAT Jaipur ITAT Directs TDS Refund Despite Delayed E-Verification; Revenue Cannot Retain Tax on Technical Grounds ITAT Quashes Reassessment: Approval from PCIT Instead of PCCIT Renders Section 148 Notice Invalid View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930