Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Naresh Samala Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Naresh Samala Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) ITAT Hyderabad: Demonetisation Cash Deposits—Matter Remanded; Opening Cash Balance to Be Accepted The Hyderabad Bench of the ITAT set aside the NFAC order sustaining addition of ₹88.84 lakh as unexplained cash deposits under section 68 for AY 2017-18 in a demonetisation-related case. The assessee, running a restaurant and bar, claimed the deposits were from sales. The Tribunal observed that the Assessing Officer failed to establish whether deposits were from demonetised currency and also did not consider the opening cash balance available as on 08.11.2...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930