Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Anant Bhalchandra Hendre Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Anant Bhalchandra Hendre Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) CIT(A) Cannot Sustain Addition Without Reasoned Order — ITAT Pune Sets Aside Ex-parte Dismissal, Restores Appeal The Pune Bench of the ITAT condoned a 123-day delay and set aside the ex-parte order of the CIT(A)/NFAC for AY 2017-18, holding that an appeal cannot be dismissed or decided mechanically for non-prosecution without complying with the mandatory requirements of section 250(6). Key findings of the Tribunal: Delay condoned on sufficient cause: Relying on Collector, Land Acquisition v. Mst. Katiji and Inder Singh v. State of MP, the Tribunal...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930