Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Akheto Yepthomi Vs ITO (ITAT Guwahati)
Related Assessment Year : 2021-22
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Akheto Yepthomi Vs ITO (ITAT Guwahati) Cash Deposits u/s 69A Remanded for Fresh Verification; Penalty u/s 271B Sustained Despite Section 10(26) Exemption The Guwahati Bench of the ITAT dealt with two appeals arising from the same assessment year—one challenging addition under section 69A and the other contesting penalty under section 271B. The assessee, a Scheduled Tribe individual claiming exemption under section 10(26), had deposited substantial cash in multiple bank accounts during AY 2021-22. The Assessing Officer treated the entire cash deposits as unexplained due to non-maintenance of ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 54F Exemption Allowed on Sale of Redeveloped Flat: ITAT Mumbai Section 28 Land Acquisition Interest Exempt as Enhanced Compensation: ITAT Delhi Bogus Purchase Addition Cannot Be Based on Suspicion Alone: ITAT Chennai Section 69 Addition Deleted as No Evidence Linked Joint Holder to Alleged On-Money: ITAT Mumbai WhatsApp Chats Accepted as Evidence, On-Money Addition Limited to 25%: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031