Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Aslam Checkar Vs ITO (Bombay High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Aslam Checkar Vs ITO (Bombay High Court) Section 205 Absolutely Bars Tax Recovery from Employees Where TDS Is Deducted but Not Deposited by Employer-Bombay High Court: The Bombay High Court, in Aslam Checkar v. Income Tax Officer & Ors., allowed a batch of writ petitions filed by employees whose employer had deducted TDS from salaries but failed to deposit the same with the Government. The petitioners were subjected to income-tax demands solely on account of such non-deposit by the employer. Interpreting Section 205 of the Income-tax Act, the Court held that the statutory bar against recov...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Quashes U/s 153C Assessments: AO Cannot Simply Copy Satisfaction Note Reopening Quashed: AO Added Share Capital, Loan & Premium Without Understanding Transaction Nature WhatsApp Chats, Screenshots & Suspicion Can’t Prove On-Money: ITAT Jaipur ITAT Directs TDS Refund Despite Delayed E-Verification; Revenue Cannot Retain Tax on Technical Grounds ITAT Quashes Reassessment: Approval from PCIT Instead of PCCIT Renders Section 148 Notice Invalid View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930